py-decorator: update to 4.4.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

py-decorator: update to 4.4.0

Klemens Nanni-2
Simple update required for another port I'm working on, which is happy
with this version.

Other than that, regress continues to pass on amd64 but it did not test
any other consumer:

        $ show-reverse-deps devel/py-decorator | wc -l
            7482

Does anyone want to throw this into a bulk?

Feedback? OK?

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-decorator/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.20 Makefile
--- Makefile 13 May 2019 18:06:43 -0000 1.20
+++ Makefile 6 Jun 2019 18:59:30 -0000
@@ -2,10 +2,9 @@
 
 COMMENT = simplify usage of decorators
 
-MODPY_EGG_VERSION = 4.0.11
+MODPY_EGG_VERSION = 4.4.0
 DISTNAME = decorator-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
 PKGNAME = py-${DISTNAME}
-REVISION = 1
 
 CATEGORIES = devel
 
Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-decorator/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 distinfo
--- distinfo 19 Jan 2017 20:22:49 -0000 1.11
+++ distinfo 6 Jun 2019 18:59:48 -0000
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (decorator-4.0.11.tar.gz) = lT1r8IKxAPQyKc9Uf0+X+X6XD1rWRe52AdVf+Hr9/nY=
-SIZE (decorator-4.0.11.tar.gz) = 70616
+SHA256 (decorator-4.4.0.tar.gz) = hhVjYcUEiLhKPxSAVupxbKWH3y8N4dNHUNNcITEnJd4=
+SIZE (decorator-4.4.0.tar.gz) = 34559

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: py-decorator: update to 4.4.0

Daniel Jakots-6
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:06:16 +0200, Klemens Nanni <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Simple update required for another port I'm working on, which is happy
> with this version.
>
> Other than that, regress continues to pass on amd64 but it did not
> test any other consumer:
>
> $ show-reverse-deps devel/py-decorator | wc -l
>    7482

haha

> Does anyone want to throw this into a bulk?

Honestly I don't think a bulk is needed for such a port, I don't know
why s-r-d says that. Your call.

> Feedback? OK?

HOMEPAGE seems to be broken, can you remove it (or put something that
works)?

with that, ok danj@

Cheers,
Daniel

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: py-decorator: update to 4.4.0

Klemens Nanni-2
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:38:21PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> HOMEPAGE seems to be broken, can you remove it (or put something that
> works)?
Removed it to use the PyPi default, cheers.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: py-decorator: update to 4.4.0

Stuart Henderson
In reply to this post by Daniel Jakots-6
On 2019/06/06 15:38, Daniel Jakots wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:06:16 +0200, Klemens Nanni <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Simple update required for another port I'm working on, which is happy
> > with this version.
> >
> > Other than that, regress continues to pass on amd64 but it did not
> > test any other consumer:
> >
> > $ show-reverse-deps devel/py-decorator | wc -l
> >    7482
>
> haha
>
> > Does anyone want to throw this into a bulk?
>
> Honestly I don't think a bulk is needed for such a port, I don't know
> why s-r-d says that. Your call.

probably need to strip down the sql query and split it into pieces to
figure out all of "why" in this case, but note s-r-d includes test
dependencies, and it acts recursively. I *think* it will list a port
if some port in its dependency chain has the port you're searching
for as a TEST_DEPENDS.

generally I think s-r-d is more useful for "how much trouble might
i be in if i break this" rather than "what do i need to test".

sqlite> select distinct fullpkgpath from depends where dependspath like 'devel/py-decorator%';
databases/py-sqlalchemy-migrate
databases/py-sqlalchemy-migrate,python3
devel/ipython
devel/ipython,python3
devel/py-addons
devel/py-bytecodeassembler
devel/py-peak-rules
devel/py-protocols
devel/py-traitlets
devel/py-traitlets,python3
www/py-httpbin
www/py-httpbin,python3
www/py-mastodon.py
www/py-mastodon.py,python3
www/py-pylons

or,

$ ls -l /usr/ports/INDEX
lrwxr-xr-x  1 sthen  _pbuild  28 Nov 20  2018 /usr/ports/INDEX -> /usr/local/share/ports-INDEX

$ grep -w devel/py-decorator /usr/ports/INDEX | cut -d'|' -f2
databases/py-sqlalchemy-migrate
databases/py-sqlalchemy-migrate,python3
devel/ipython
devel/ipython,python3
devel/py-decorator
devel/py-decorator,python3
devel/py-traitlets
devel/py-traitlets,python3
www/py-httpbin
www/py-httpbin,python3
www/py-mastodon.py
www/py-mastodon.py,python3
www/py-pylons

you can write that to a file and feed it to SUBDIRLIST:

$ grep -w devel/py-decorator /usr/ports/INDEX | cut -d'|' -f2 > /tmp/plist.decorator
$ cd /usr/ports; make SUBDIRLIST=/tmp/plist.decorator package

etc.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: py-decorator: update to 4.4.0

Daniel Jakots-6
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 00:24:58 +0100, Stuart Henderson
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> > > Does anyone want to throw this into a bulk?  
> >
> > Honestly I don't think a bulk is needed for such a port, I don't
> > know why s-r-d says that. Your call.  
>
> generally I think s-r-d is more useful for "how much trouble might
> i be in if i break this" rather than "what do i need to test".

Totally agreed.

I did run at my good ol' showvictims.py before saying the above ;)