devel/arm-elf/gcc (was: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

devel/arm-elf/gcc (was: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports)

Christian Weisgerber
On 2014-06-07, Stuart Henderson <[hidden email]> wrote:

> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: ports
> Changes by: [hidden email] 2014/06/07 14:20:42
>
> Modified files:
> devel/arm-elf/gcc: Makefile
>
> Log message:
> mark BROKEN-i386; segfaults during build

I think this is generally broken.  On amd64 it also segfaults during
the build quite frequently.  Looking at the last bulk builds:

2014-04-26      ok
2014-04-28      fail
2014-05-09      fail
2014-05-13      fail
2014-05-19      ok
2014-05-26      fail
2014-06-03      ok

--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: devel/arm-elf/gcc (was: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports)

Tobias Ulmer
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:45:02PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:

> On 2014-06-07, Stuart Henderson <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > CVSROOT: /cvs
> > Module name: ports
> > Changes by: [hidden email] 2014/06/07 14:20:42
> >
> > Modified files:
> > devel/arm-elf/gcc: Makefile
> >
> > Log message:
> > mark BROKEN-i386; segfaults during build
>
> I think this is generally broken.  On amd64 it also segfaults during
> the build quite frequently.  Looking at the last bulk builds:
>
> 2014-04-26      ok
> 2014-04-28      fail
> 2014-05-09      fail
> 2014-05-13      fail
> 2014-05-19      ok
> 2014-05-26      fail
> 2014-06-03      ok
>

Who is actively using arm-elf?
If nobody is using it, it should be unhooked.

It can remain a good starting point for anyone wanting to build a
embedded arm toolchain. I'm generally interested in the topic, but have
more than enough on my plate right now.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: devel/arm-elf/gcc (was: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports)

Matthieu Herrb
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 07:29:21PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:45:02PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > On 2014-06-07, Stuart Henderson <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > CVSROOT: /cvs
> > > Module name: ports
> > > Changes by: [hidden email] 2014/06/07 14:20:42
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > devel/arm-elf/gcc: Makefile
> > >
> > > Log message:
> > > mark BROKEN-i386; segfaults during build
> >
> > I think this is generally broken.  On amd64 it also segfaults during
> > the build quite frequently.  Looking at the last bulk builds:
> >
> > 2014-04-26      ok
> > 2014-04-28      fail
> > 2014-05-09      fail
> > 2014-05-13      fail
> > 2014-05-19      ok
> > 2014-05-26      fail
> > 2014-06-03      ok
> >
>
> Who is actively using arm-elf?
> If nobody is using it, it should be unhooked.
>
> It can remain a good starting point for anyone wanting to build a
> embedded arm toolchain. I'm generally interested in the topic, but have
> more than enough on my plate right now.
>

I used to have ports to build u-boot and x-loader in ports for some of
the supported boards. They used this port to cross-compile it, but
this approach is more or less a dead end.

I don't have plans to revice this work.
--
Matthieu Herrb