automake

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

automake

frantisek holop
hi there,

is someone working on automake 1.10+?
some newer ports seem to require it.

-f
--
and god said, e = 1/2mv^2 - ze^2/r, and there was light.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[wip] automake (was: Re: automake)

frantisek holop
hmm, on Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:29:47PM +0100, frantisek holop said that
> is someone working on automake 1.10+?
> some newer ports seem to require it.

hi there,

here is a work in progress for automake 1.11 against autoconf 2.62.
the next step could be upgrading autoconf to 2.65 but
i got lost in it somewhere :]  (it's a terrifying piece of software)

i replaced the previous regress with its internal test suite,
most of the tests passed/failed as expected but they are still running,
they are dog slow.  maybe someone with a faster machine could run
through them as well, and help out with the traces of the failed ones.

copy the attached directory into automake/ and add

SUBDIR+=1.11

to the Makefile.  please test and comment.

-f
--
self-reference (n.): see self-reference

automake-1.11.tgz (3K) Download Attachment