OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

R0me0 ***
Hello misc,

I have a little doubt

Today was a Official Release of 6.0

This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?

Thanks in advance,

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Daniel Ouellet
On 9/1/16 2:59 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I have a little doubt
>
> Today was a Official Release of 6.0
>
> This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?

Yes you need to apply the patch.

The release was done long ago already it was release to the public
today. Takes time to get all piece together you know.

Might be more welcome to say thanks to the devs instead don't you think?

I am sure they would appreciate that more...

Best,

Daniel

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Francois Pussault-2
In reply to this post by R0me0 ***
hello, no apply patches new if you want to

> ----------------------------------------
> From: R0me0 *** <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thu Sep 01 20:59:43 CEST 2016
> To: OpenBSD Misc <[hidden email]>
> Subject: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html
>
>
> Hello misc,
>
> I have a little doubt
>
> Today was a Official Release of 6.0
>
> This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>


Cordialement
Francois Pussault
10 chemin de négo saoumos
apt 202 - bat 2
31300 Toulouse
+33 6 17 230 820
[hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

R0me0 ***
Howdy !

Thanks for quick reply

Really appreciated.

Regards,





2016-09-01 16:06 GMT-03:00 Francois Pussault <[hidden email]>:

> hello, no apply patches new if you want to
>
> > ----------------------------------------
> > From: R0me0 *** <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Thu Sep 01 20:59:43 CEST 2016
> > To: OpenBSD Misc <[hidden email]>
> > Subject: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html
> >
> >
> > Hello misc,
> >
> > I have a little doubt
> >
> > Today was a Official Release of 6.0
> >
> > This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
>
>
> Cordialement
> Francois Pussault
> 10 chemin de négo saoumos
> apt 202 - bat 2
> 31300 Toulouse
> +33 6 17 230 820
> [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Consus
In reply to this post by R0me0 ***
On 15:59 Thu 01 Sep, R0me0 *** wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I have a little doubt
>
> Today was a Official Release of 6.0
>
> This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?
>
> Thanks in advance,

Yeah, you probably should. Also you can use M:Tier, they ship binary
errata updates: https://stable.mtier.org

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Alexander Hall
In reply to this post by Daniel Ouellet
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:03:15PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:

> On 9/1/16 2:59 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
> > Hello misc,
> >
> > I have a little doubt
> >
> > Today was a Official Release of 6.0
> >
> > This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?
>
> Yes you need to apply the patch.
>
> The release was done long ago already it was release to the public
> today. Takes time to get all piece together you know.
>
> Might be more welcome to say thanks to the devs instead don't you think?

So instead of asking "How does this work?" he should say "Thanks!" (and
still not know how it works)?

I don't see the connection. It was just a question, and at least I could
not read anything extra into it.

/Alexander

>
> I am sure they would appreciate that more...
>
> Best,
>
> Daniel

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:03:15PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > On 9/1/16 2:59 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
> > > Hello misc,
> > >
> > > I have a little doubt
> > >
> > > Today was a Official Release of 6.0
> > >
> > > This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to apply ?
> >
> > Yes you need to apply the patch.
> >
> > The release was done long ago already it was release to the public
> > today. Takes time to get all piece together you know.
> >
> > Might be more welcome to say thanks to the devs instead don't you think?
>
> So instead of asking "How does this work?" he should say "Thanks!" (and
> still not know how it works)?
>
> I don't see the connection. It was just a question, and at least I could
> not read anything extra into it.
>
> /Alexander

I think it's the use of the word "doubt" ("a feeling of uncertainty or
lack of conviction").

I have noticed that some people tend to use "I have a doubt" with the
meaning "I have a question/issue/problem".  This is different from "I'm
doubting" which means "I have no confidence in" or "I'm questioning".



>
> >
> > I am sure they would appreciate that more...
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Daniel
>

--
Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
Bioinformatics Developer
NBIS, Uppsala University
http://www.nbis.se/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

bytevolcano
Hello Andreas,

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:29:28 +0200
Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:03:15PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > > On 9/1/16 2:59 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
> > > > Hello misc,
> > > >
> > > > I have a little doubt
> > > >
> > > > Today was a Official Release of 6.0
> > > >
> > > > This release already include errata60.html patches or I need to
> > > > apply ?
> > >
> > > Yes you need to apply the patch.
> > >
> > > The release was done long ago already it was release to the public
> > > today. Takes time to get all piece together you know.
> > >
> > > Might be more welcome to say thanks to the devs instead don't you
> > > think?
> >
> > So instead of asking "How does this work?" he should say
> > "Thanks!" (and still not know how it works)?
> >
> > I don't see the connection. It was just a question, and at least I
> > could not read anything extra into it.
> >
> > /Alexander
>
> I think it's the use of the word "doubt" ("a feeling of uncertainty or
> lack of conviction").
>
> I have noticed that some people tend to use "I have a doubt" with the
> meaning "I have a question/issue/problem".  This is different from
> "I'm doubting" which means "I have no confidence in" or "I'm
> questioning".
>

I think it is important to note here that not everyone speaks fluent
English. I think a huge problem within mailing lists in general is the
tendency for people to gang up and focus on petty wording issues, and
associating "attitude" or "tone" with words, focusing on the point
of a post itself.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Roderick
In reply to this post by Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:

> I think it's the use of the word "doubt" ("a feeling of uncertainty or
> lack of conviction").
>
> I have noticed that some people tend to use "I have a doubt" with the
> meaning "I have a question/issue/problem".  This is different from "I'm
> doubting" which means "I have no confidence in" or "I'm questioning".

Perhaps you have doubts about the meaning of "doubt".

Just see latin "dubius".

But no one will call you or anyone here ignorant because of this,
as the original poster was called ungrateful.

Rodrigo.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Etienne
In reply to this post by bytevolcano
On 09/02/16 11:56, [hidden email] wrote:

> I have noticed that some people tend to use "I have a doubt" with the
> meaning "I have a question/issue/problem".  This is different from
> "I'm doubting" which means "I have no confidence in" or "I'm
> questioning".
>
> I think it is important to note here that not everyone speaks fluent
> English. I think a huge problem within mailing lists in general is the
> tendency for people to gang up and focus on petty wording issues, and
> associating "attitude" or "tone" with words, focusing on the point
> of a post itself.
>
Completely agree, worth mentioning again and again.

--
Étienne

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Jack J. Woehr
Etienne wrote:
> I have noticed that some people tend to use "I have a doubt" with the
> meaning "I have a question/issue/problem".

And the native French speaker will sometimes say, "I doubt" meaning "I suspect ..." or "I think that ..."

--
Jack J. Woehr     # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of
www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the universe
www.softwoehr.com # with a fine understanding of human fallibility. - Carl Sagan

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 release and errata60.html

Consus
In reply to this post by Consus
On 11:14 Fri 02 Sep, Consus wrote:
> Yeah, you probably should. Also you can use M:Tier, they ship binary
> errata updates: https://stable.mtier.org

There is already a full set of binary patches. These guys are so sweet.