Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64

Kurt Mosiejczuk-9
net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
builds.

ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?

--Kurt

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mutella/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.19 Makefile
--- Makefile 12 Jul 2019 20:48:32 -0000 1.19
+++ Makefile 13 Feb 2020 02:42:46 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.19 2019/07/12 20:48:32 sthen Exp $
 
+BROKEN-sparc64= ISO C++ forbids converting a string constant to 'LPSTR'
+
 COMMENT= gnutella client with an easy to use interface
 
 DISTNAME= mutella-0.4.5

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)

Charlene Wendling
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500
Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:

> net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> builds.
>
> ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?

It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it
instead:

- SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc
- last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked
  software, the development list is dead since more than a decade
- it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason
- there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is
  still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is
  even a warning about that when you start it :)

Charlène.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)

Kurt Mosiejczuk-9
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500
> Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:

> > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> > builds.

> > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?

> It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it
> instead:

> - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc
> - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked
>   software, the development list is dead since more than a decade
> - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason
> - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is
>   still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is
>   even a warning about that when you start it :)

I was touching that code? Gross. :)

ok kmos to remove

--Kurt

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)

Solene Rapenne
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:07:01AM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500
> > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>
> > > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> > > builds.
>
> > > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?
>
> > It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it
> > instead:
>
> > - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc
> > - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked
> >   software, the development list is dead since more than a decade
> > - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason
> > - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is
> >   still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is
> >   even a warning about that when you start it :)
>
> I was touching that code? Gross. :)
>
> ok kmos to remove
>
> --Kurt
>
ok solene@ for removal

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)

Frederic Cambus
In reply to this post by Charlene Wendling
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:

> > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> > builds.
> >
> > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?
>
> It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it
> instead:
>
> - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc
> - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked
>   software, the development list is dead since more than a decade
> - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason
> - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is
>   still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is
>   even a warning about that when you start it :)

OK fcambus@ to remove.