GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

Brett Mahar-2
Hi misc,

I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.

This time I remember to:
ok?

Brett.


Index: src/share/man/man3/intro.3
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/cvsync/src/share/man/man3/intro.3,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -p -u -r1.57 intro.3
--- src/share/man/man3/intro.3 10 Aug 2013 16:52:54 -0000 1.57
+++ src/share/man/man3/intro.3 13 Sep 2013 02:58:12 -0000
@@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ See
  Note: users do not normally have to explicitly link with this library.
  .Pp
  .It libsupc++ Pq Fl lsupc++
-(non GCC 2.95 systems only)
  C++ core language support
  (exceptions, new, typeinfo).
  Note: users do not normally have to explicitly link with this library.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

Jason McIntyre-2
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:03:01PM +1000, Brett Mahar wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
>
> This time I remember to:
> ok?
>

yes, ok ;)
jmc

> Brett.
>
>
> Index: src/share/man/man3/intro.3
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/cvsync/src/share/man/man3/intro.3,v
> retrieving revision 1.57
> diff -u -p -u -r1.57 intro.3
> --- src/share/man/man3/intro.3 10 Aug 2013 16:52:54 -0000 1.57
> +++ src/share/man/man3/intro.3 13 Sep 2013 02:58:12 -0000
> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ See
>  Note: users do not normally have to explicitly link with this library.
>  .Pp
>  .It libsupc++ Pq Fl lsupc++
> -(non GCC 2.95 systems only)
>  C++ core language support
>  (exceptions, new, typeinfo).
>  Note: users do not normally have to explicitly link with this library.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

Jim MacKenzie
In reply to this post by Brett Mahar-2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of Brett Mahar
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:03 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
>
> I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.

I'm not sure if it matters here, but the VAX port of OpenBSD still uses GCC
2.95.

Jim

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

David Coppa
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Jim MacKenzie <[hidden email]> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
>> Of Brett Mahar
>> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:03 PM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
>>
>> I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
>
> I'm not sure if it matters here, but the VAX port of OpenBSD still uses GCC
> 2.95.

No more.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

Sebastian Reitenbach
In reply to this post by Jim MacKenzie
On Friday, September 13, 2013 18:06 CEST, "Jim MacKenzie" <[hidden email]> wrote:
 

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> > Of Brett Mahar
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:03 PM
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
> >
> > I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
>
> I'm not sure if it matters here, but the VAX port of OpenBSD still uses GCC
> 2.95.
>

not in -current anymore.

Sebastian

> Jim

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

Jim MacKenzie
In reply to this post by David Coppa
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of David Coppa
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:14 AM
> To: Jim MacKenzie
> Cc: misc
> Subject: Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
>
> >> I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it matters here, but the VAX port of OpenBSD still
> > uses GCC 2.95.
>
> No more.

My 5.3 VAXstation 4000/60 system still uses 2.95.  Yes, still have a VAX.
Maybe this is changing in 5.4.

Jim

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)

Brad Smith-14
On 13/09/13 1:13 PM, Jim MacKenzie wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
>> Of David Coppa
>> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:14 AM
>> To: Jim MacKenzie
>> Cc: misc
>> Subject: Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
>>
>>>> I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if it matters here, but the VAX port of OpenBSD still
>>> uses GCC 2.95.
>>
>> No more.
>
> My 5.3 VAXstation 4000/60 system still uses 2.95.  Yes, still have a VAX.
> Maybe this is changing in 5.4.

Yes, 5.3 is old ;)


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.