On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:39:51PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I tried to add a debug package for shells/bash, but the result would
> only contain debug data for some loadable modules and skip the actual
> bash binary.
> Oh, of course. It is marked @shell and not @bin in the PLIST.
> We could change OpenBSD/PackingElement.pm to add @shell to the
> binary types... but then does a shell have to be a binary? psh
> from shells/perlsh clearly isn't.
> So... uh?
As a hack, you could install bash twice, as a hardlink annotated with @bin ?
Otherwise, it could be written and recognized as a supplementary annotation,
like @comment no checksum.