Clarify relevance of PF FAQ

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Clarify relevance of PF FAQ

Michael McConville-2
Assuming that what's described applies to the most recent releases. You
could also argue that this disclaimer is old enough to be deleted.


Index: faq/pf/nat.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/pf/nat.html,v
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -p -r1.54 nat.html
--- faq/pf/nat.html 2 Jul 2015 05:49:05 -0000 1.54
+++ faq/pf/nat.html 25 Sep 2015 23:31:27 -0000
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ in the default install. Remove the <tt>#
 forwarding will be enabled when the machine is rebooted.
 
 <h2 id="config">Configuring NAT</h2>
-<font color="#ff0000">NOTE:</font> This information is for OpenBSD 4.7.
-NAT configuration was significantly different in earlier versions.
+<font color="#ff0000">NOTE:</font> This information is for OpenBSD 4.7 and
+later. NAT configuration was significantly different in earlier versions.
 <p>
 
 NAT is specified as an optional <tt>nat-to</tt> parameter to an

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Clarify relevance of PF FAQ

Stuart Henderson-6
On 2015/09/25 19:34, Michael McConville wrote:
> Assuming that what's described applies to the most recent releases. You
> could also argue that this disclaimer is old enough to be deleted.

Thanks - I've deleted it.