> This has been discussed over and over and over and over and over and
> over and over. Look at the archives, no more NEW gpl code will be
> allowed in the tree. So besides gcc there is virtually nothing left
> In case you didn't know gpl 2 sucks shit and so does apache 2.
> OpenBSD's version of apache is quite different than what they used to
> ship since we forked it. Apache 2 is in ports.
> Again, this is a very un-researched and, on these lists, considered a
> DUMB question.
> On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:46 PM, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I've checked the Apache 2 License, which is said to be GPL-2
> > compatible (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). So, OpenBSD include some
> > GPL programs (gcc), so what's make it "unacceptable"
> > (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#HowAbout) ? What are the
> > differences with Apache 1.3 License ?
> > Thanks,
> > Best regards,
> > Bruno.
> On 12/3/05, Marco Peereboom <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > In case you didn't know gpl 2 sucks shit and so does apache 2.
> > OpenBSD's version of apache is quite different than what they used to
> > ship since we forked it. Apache 2 is in ports.
Where? As I can see, It was 6 years ago under www/apache... not now.